Menu Menu

Appendix — Site-Selection Voting

by George Flynn

While I was working on the 1988 version of this article, Bruce Pelz asked me if I could compile a tabulation of site-selection voting figures. The two subjects seemed to go together well, so I decided to publish them together; this still seems appropriate. The total vote counts have already been included in Table 1, but these depend a lot on how many (and which) candidates are running. Of greater interest are the actual voting counts, to which this appendix is devoted. (It would of course be nice to have a compilation of the Hugo voting counts too, but that would take a fairly large volume.)

The present site-selection system, with both mail and at-convention balloting, has been in effect since 1972; before that the voting was done only at the Business Meetings (with a couple of exceptions for overseas cons). The last serious contest under the old system was in 1969 (at St. Louis), when Boston defeated Washington 169–119 for the 1971 Worldcon; as it happened, that was my first Business Meeting. (Note that the at-con voting continued to take place at the Business Meeting until the mid-’70s.)

As in the Hugo discussion, the years listed below indicate when the voting took place (with the voting sites in parentheses). Note that the 1971 through 1988 Worldcons were chosen two years in advance, and those since 1989 three years in advance. During the ’70s the numbers released were somewhat spotty, so I’ll start by discussing each year separately.

1972 (Los Angeles):

109 mail, 147 at-con ballots; total 256. At the last minute New York withdrew, and Washington was declared the unanimous winner; no voting counts were released.

1973 (Toronto):

Melbourne 330, Los Angeles 45; total 375. (If any separate mail and at-con figures were announced, I can’t find them. Here and for the next few years, I don’t have any numbers for “No Preference,” write-ins, etc., so the “totals” are probably low.)

1974 (Washington)
1st ballot 2nd ballot
mail at-con total
Kansas City 226 92 318 424
New Orleans 117 78 195 253
Columbus 43 89 132
386 259 645 677

This was one of the only two times in the mail-ballot era when a second ballot has been required to determine the winner (1990 was the other one). I assume the extra 32 votes on the second ballot came from what I call “other” votes below.

1975 (Melbourne):

Orlando 298, New York 111, Washington 91, Philadelphia 28; total 528. I don’t have the mail/at-con breakdown, except that the great majority of votes were by mail.

1976 (Kansas City)
mail at-con total
Phoenix 145 388 533
Los Angeles 100 360 460
245 748 993

1977 (Miami Beach):

884 votes cast. Brighton overwhelmingly defeated New Orleans; vote made unanimous without revealing vote counts.

1978 (Phoenix):

Boston defeated Baltimore, but the breakdown wasn’t released; the “No Preference” votes were announced as for the hoax bid of Flushing. Here’s what was released:

mail at-con total
Boston or Baltimore 379 584 963
“Flushing” 40 21 61
invalid 125 5 130
544 610 1154

(The invalid ballots mostly lacked the voting fee — probably because the ballot neglected to mention that one was required. As far as I know, there haven’t been anywhere near as many invalid ballots in any later year.)

From 1979 on, complete voting counts have been released, and since 1980 the WSFS Constitution has required their publication. In the tables that follow, the totals for “No Preference,” “None of the Above,” write-ins, and (sometimes) void ballots have been combined into a single “other” line to save space; they’re usually negligible except when there’s an unopposed bid (or one with no effective opposition). No further commentary should be necessary.

1979 (Brighton)
mail at-con total
Denver 275 178 453
Seattle 172 148 320
Los Angeles 85 45 130
other 16 1 17
548 372 920

 

1980 (Boston)
Chicago 539 479 1018
Detroit 228 182 410
other 80 41 121
847 702 1549

 

1981 (Denver)
Baltimore 432 484 916
Australia 266 257 523
Scandinavia 89 100 189
other 32 20 52
819 861 1680

 

1982 (Chicago)
mail at-con total
Los Angeles 406 508 914
other 95 110 205
501 618 1119

 

1983 (Baltimore)
mail at-con total
Melbourne 285 357 642
other 61 26 87
346 383 729

 

1984 (Los Angeles)
mail at-con total
Atlanta 298 491 749
Philadelphia 116 185 301
New York 96 146 242
other 10 26 36
520 848 1368

 

1985 (Melbourne)
mail at-con total
Brighton 145 262 407
Phoenix 88 14 102
other 8 10 18
241 286 527

 

1986 (Atlanta), for 1988
mail at-con total
New Orleans 269 643 912
“Bermuda Triangle” 189 236 425
Cincinnati 100 149 249
St. Louis 83 110 193
other 30 54 84
671 1192 1863

 

1986 (Atlanta), for 1989
mail at-con total
Boston 426 652 1078
other 83 115 198
509 767 1276

 

1987 (Brighton)
mail at-con total
The Hague 98 712 810
Los Angeles 128 402 530
other 6 27 33
232 1141 1373

 

1988 (New Orleans)
mail at-con total
Chicago 335 882 1217
Sydney 75 123 198
other 7 33 40
417 1038 1455

 

1989 (Boston)
mail at-con total
Orlando 355 1030 1385
Washington 37 75 112
other 44 95 139
436 1200 1636

 

1990 (The Hague)
1st ballot
San Francisco 174 262 436
Hawaii (write-in) 67 232 299
Zagreb 30 145 175
Phoenix 50 97 147
No Preference 6 20 26
other 2 3 5
329 739 1088
2nd ballot
mail at-con total
San Francisco 175 264 439
Hawaii (write-in) 68 233 301
Zagreb 30 145 175
Phoenix 50 97 147
No Preference 6 20 26
3rd ballot
mail at-con total
San Francisco 204 316 520
Hawaii (write-in) 82 242 324
Zagreb 35 158 193
No Preference 8 43 51

 

1991 (Chicago)
mail at-con total
Winnipeg 332 680 1012
Louisville 339 618 957
other 42 75 117
713 1373 2086

 

1992 (Orlando)
mail at-con other total
Glasgow 322 950 38 1310
Atlanta 248 867 32 1147
other 42 34 1 52
587 1851 71 2509

(The “other” column comprised problem ballots that were counted separately; I presume they included both mail and at-con ballots.)

 

1993 (San Francisco)
mail at-con total
Los Angeles 206 926 1132
other 25 125 150
329 739 1088

 

1994 (Winnipeg)
mail at-con total
San Antonio 200 715 915
St. Louis 78 388 466
other 18 40 58
296 1143 1439

 

1995 (Glasgow)
mail at-con total
Baltimore 296 516 812
Boston 103 221 324
Atlanta 91 103 194
Niagara Falls 63 126 189
other 17 18 35
570 984 1554

 

1996 (Los Angeles)
mail at-con total
Australia 260 548 808
Zagreb 27 131 158
other 32 66 98
319 745 1064

 

1997 (San Antonio)
mail at-con total
Chicago 304 989 1293
other 23 151 174
total 327 1140 1467

 

1998 (Baltimore)
mail at-con total
Philadelphia 181 964 1145
Orlando 169 771 940
other 17 66 83
total 367 1801 2168

 

1999 (Melbourne)
mail at-con total
San Jose 247 419 666
Roswell 51 69 120
other 9 25 34
307 513 820

I note that every site-selection vote since 1981 (even in Australia) has had more at-con than mail ballots, and that the typical ratio seems to be getting more disproportionate in recent years. Is this due to an increasing distrust of the mails? (The highest at-con percentage was 83.10% in 1987, when there, ah, seems to have been a problem with the mail ballots; but 1998’s 83.07% was about as close as one can get.)

This suggests that my 1980 counts by date of receipt are no longer very relevant, but I might as well include the data anyway; the ballots went out on May 1, with a nominal mail-in deadline of Aug 15:

May 4–10 8
May 11–17 83
May 18–24 90
May 25–31 43
Jun 1–7 36
Jun 8–14 43
Jun 15–21 37
Jun 22–28 38
Jun 29–Jul 5 39
Jul 6–12 77
Jul 13–19 145
Jul 20–26 41
Jul 27–Aug 2 31
Aug 3–9 32
Aug 10–16 58
Aug 17–23 42
Aug 24–28 4
at convention 702

(1 mail ballot arrived after the con.) The major peak was of course at the Hugo/preregistration deadline.

For the at-con distribution of votes, we do have data from some recent years:

Thurs Fri Sat Total
1991 209 473 691 1373
1992 310 646 895 1851
1994 142 431 570 1143
1995 213 351 420 984
1996 82 203 460 745
1997 174 379 587 1140
1998 W: 342 Th: 488 F: 971 1801
1999 181 182 150 513

The first three averaged out pretty steadily to about 15% on Thursday, 36% on Friday, and 50% on Saturday. But in 1995 the breakdown was 22%, 36%, 43% (earlier voting because of the more central location?); while in 1996 (with a less central location) there was a shift in the opposite direction, giving 11%, 27%, 62%. Then 1997 had 15%, 33%, 51%; while 1998 (with the voting one day earlier) had 19%, 27%, 54%. The 1999 voting (with about 125 votes hand-carried) was completely atypical.

Addendum: NASFiC Site Selection